First of all, understand that there is a mind greater than your own, and connecting with this consciousness is possible. It is the mind of God but some do not acknowledge his deity even when describing him or his creation. Thus we have the "universal mind" depicted by Paracelsus or the "collective unconscious" in the language of C.G. Jung.

Second, some basic concepts in logic are extremely useful to our organization. It starts with Aristotle and the excluded middle . The form of syllogistic logic he championed was the foundation for Boole's work and drives classical computing today. It is solid and useful because of its inherent stability. The noise of electronic circuits is mitigated by the threshold of what constitutes a one and what constitutes a zero, thus eliminating error and providing stability.

However, all the "magic" lies in the middle that Aristotle excluded. The principles involved are ancient and were debated in his day but trinary logic did not find much of a home until recently. Modern scholars have found ways of working with 3VL (three value logic) that have some merit, but for our purposes, the "fuzzy logic" approach is not particularly valuable. Neither is any process dependent on probabilities, or prone to paradoxes and instability.

Instead, when the strong Kleene rules of indeterminacy are applied, one can add a slight twist and plan for contingencies. Unsettled values are strictly unknown and remain so in the truth table but they can also be assumed and assigned outcomes in a logic design. That is not the typical way to approach the subject but it does create advantages.

This is an oversimplification but let's assume q is a qubit. When undetermined (q) is totally unknown. When determined it is either a 1 (p) or 0 (b) so we can say (q = p or b). Known states process classically. If you wish, a different pathway can be assigned for each value, with whatever consequences you care to design.

While still in the undetermined state, a settled binary outcome can be assumed (q) = 1 (g) or 0 (d) so we can say (q = g or d). The assigned values differ from above and the assumed 1 or 0 allow consequences to be designed that time will later impose .

When the qubit is finally determined, a consequence is realized 100% of the time but only half of the (g or d) pathway is used. This approach acts like precognition and allows one to " in a sense " trick time. On the level of logic, you can ambush a result before it occurs. The approach cares nothing for probability and deals with an anticipated certainty that has designed consequences.

So we have p,b,g,d, and q to play with. Two for settled states, two for yet to be settled states, q remains strictly unknown (unless a decision was made or is assumed). We concentrate solely on those values in our logic designs and each value has designed consequences.

In vortex math, thirds, doubling, and rhythm (which implies resonance) head into an interesting area. The work of Pythagoras is inextricably tied to the phenomenon involved.

As a model, the area of thirds can be used to represent quantum weirdness. The area of doubling can symbolize the stability and practicality of binary logic.

This abstraction depicts the quantum world as interlocked with our existential reality with mathematical relationships that can be leveraged in many ways. However, forget about the math and the models for a moment and think spirituality.

In Rev. 3:16, there are just 3 states of being in God's eyes. Hot, cold, or lukewarm. Each has consequences. When we take this concept into the realm of 3VL, things get very interesting. Then when you consider quantum mind and the measurement problem, the implications become staggering. What if our logic values are applied to people who are good, evil, or undecided? What if we were to "get with the program" and design systems that cooperate with God and act upon moral choices?

Quantum computing and fuzzy logic both work on probabilities. Quantum mind and spirituality are much harder to quantify. A person can be wicked all of their life and suddenly turn like King Ahab (1 Kings 21:27). They can also be sailing on the sea of salvation and make a shipwreck of their faith (1 Timothy 1:19).

Whether probable or not is not the question, but rather can logic designs allow moral decisions to assign consequences? Can they be used to reward the righteous and punish the wicked?

The wealthy elite want a technocracy where people are like rats in a maze. They want the system rigged to provide flesh for fantasy, slaves they can surveil and control. However, technology can also be used to shepherd sheep and trap wolves. The same match that can burn down a building can also be used to light a campfire and roast marshmallows. Like any tool, it all depends on who is in control of it and what their motivations are.

Influence, decisions, consequences, they can be designed on a circuit board, in a program, or in real life. People management systems can be proactive and unconventional. He who wins souls is wise (Proverbs 11:30), evil must be reproved (Eph. 5:11). Intercession, intervention, proclamation, these all require action and some degree of intrusion.

A program based on these concepts runs on a monthly cycle. It provides a way of separating whitehats from blackhats and forcing those who can't decide to choose sides.

Perhaps a scientist would say it involves quantum minds connected in some sort of hive mind, linked by a greater cosmic consciousness. To a believer, it is just the body of Christ winning souls and bringing dark to light.

The basic concepts discussed here are key to some designs the SS members work with. Keeping in mind that nothing online is private, no more can be said unless in a face to face training session off the grid.

In public spaces where "normies" dwell, the practical applications are typically represented by metaphor. Silly stories and graphics (as below), illustrate concepts and communicate in ways that won't make the black hats and their AI filters have kittens. Yet the truth of what is happening behind the scenes is made abundantly clear for those who have eyes to see.